<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>attentionscan &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/category/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog</link>
	<description>more signal, less noise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Going Offline: Technology, Hurricanes and Productivity</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/going-offline-technology-hurricanes-productivity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/going-offline-technology-hurricanes-productivity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Talbot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[going dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricane sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missing out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power outages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the verge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV commercials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idfive.com/blog/?p=2930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every once and a while something happens and we are in the somewhat unfortunate state of being &#8220;offline&#8221;. With smartphones, tablets, netbooks with built-in 4G technology it&#8217;s a rare occurrence that we actually have a chance to disconnect from the hyper-highway of digital input. Admittedly, disconnecting is a hard thing to do even during &#8220;Me Time&#8221; before and after [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/going-offline-technology-hurricanes-productivity/">Going Offline: Technology, Hurricanes and Productivity</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once and a while something happens and we are in the somewhat unfortunate state of being &#8220;offline&#8221;. With <em>smart</em>phones, tablets, netbooks with built-in 4G technology it&#8217;s a rare occurrence that we actually have a chance to disconnect from the hyper-highway of digital input.</p>
<p>Admittedly, disconnecting is a hard thing to do even during &#8220;Me Time&#8221; before and after work. I constantly catch myself checking email, surfing blogs and listening to podcasts. Usually all at once while indulging in my Netflix queue or watching another rerun of that same episode of Law &amp; Order: SVU. It&#8217;s a miracle my eyes havent crossed and my brain can still function normally. It usually takes something drastic and urgent to pull me away from my digital connects but within a short period of time I&#8217;m back at it.</p>
<p>The past few days, the whole Mid-Atlantic has been getting pounded by <a href="https://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;sugexp=les%3Bepsugrpq1&amp;gs_nf=3&amp;tok=0WyFMbC5hF5uxfK320WCWQ&amp;cp=5&amp;gs_id=j&amp;xhr=t&amp;q=hurricane+sandy&amp;pf=p&amp;safe=off&amp;output=search&amp;sclient=psy-ab&amp;oq=hurri&amp;gs_l=&amp;pbx=1&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&amp;fp=2d96ede210ccce61&amp;bpcl=36601534&amp;biw=1264&amp;bih=659">Hurricane/Tropical Depression/Tropical Storm Sandy</a>. With high wind, relentless rain and falling trees, many people were forcibly disconnected from their computers, tablets, smartphones and TVs when the power went out. This is usually enough to push most teens, &#8220;tweens&#8221; and some full-grown adults into full blown panic. Luckily this time around, my power stayed on which allowed me to track the storm in full 1080p, 60K vivid color detail while others stumbled around in the dark looking for a flashlight. And as nice as it was to go to relax watching HGTV with my family, I was jealous of those who were sitting in the silence.</p>
<p>Why am I jealous? Well because of all this technology for the past two days I&#8217;ve been &#8220;telecommuting&#8221; along with my co-workers, working from the comfort of home. But besides having a reason to be a slacker and watch the Price is Right all day long, I&#8217;m jealous of all the time those people without power are getting to spend with their own thoughts. It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t enjoy avoiding the traffic to the office on my morning commute or that I don&#8217;t enjoy the presence of my growing family but it&#8217;s all just more distractions to deal with. The crying baby, the urge to poke around in the fridge, the feeling to need to watch the TV glowing over my shoulder and family and friends texting and calling to see how we are. Even thought I raise the volume on my headphones, silenced my cellphone and closed all the other windows on the computer, I can still hear the chime of all the emails I receive, the phone vibrating on the shelf behind me and the TV commercial jingles that are 20 dB louder than the volume of the show my wife is watching.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theverge.com/users/futurepaul/blog">Paul Miller</a>, One of the writers of <a href="http://www.theverge.com/">The Verge</a>, one my favorite technology news sites, has been living without the internet for a little over 6 months now proving that you can exist in today&#8217;s world without technology&#8230;but the real question is, without constant connectivity can you stay relevant? If you were to ask him, I would image that the answer would be a resounding yes. But it wasn&#8217;t all that easy to get started. In his most recent post, <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/26/3555640/offline-missing-out-paul-miller"><em>Offline: missing out</em></a>, Paul Miller outlines some of the nagging, compulsive, repetitive things we do each hour of each day to ensure we&#8217;re not &#8220;missing out&#8221; on literally everything going on around us and how he was able to overcome them. Having abandoned the internet, he has felt more in control of his time. He writes about how much easier it is to focus on one task at a time, kind of like a mental deprivation chamber, eliminating the distractions and dead-end stray paths we commonly get distracted with.</p>
<p>Though I don&#8217;t see how I could personally do all that he has living without the internet but it&#8217;s certainly reassuring that commerce, friendship and life can exist with, or without, the internet. I would certainly encourage all of you to venture into the unknown and unplug for an extended period of time. Start small and see if  you can go 6, 7, 8 or even 12 hours without using the internet. Don&#8217;t check twitter, don&#8217;t check your Facebook, email, or text messages, watch broadcast TV and step away from the computer. It&#8217;s scary at frist but once you get over that initial fear of &#8220;missing out&#8221; you&#8217;ll see how much more you can get done and how much more you can do and how clear your thoughts can become.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/going-offline-technology-hurricanes-productivity/">Going Offline: Technology, Hurricanes and Productivity</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/going-offline-technology-hurricanes-productivity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remain Sane During this Election Season with Unpolitic.me</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/remain-sane-during-election-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/remain-sane-during-election-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Talbot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idfive.com/blog/?p=2920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So we all know THAT person. The one who&#8217;s filling up your news feed with all the meme&#8217;s and posts supporting their favorite political party and attacking the other. If you&#8217;re like me, you may find some of them funny or intriguing but are completely fed up with being forced to read this every day [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/remain-sane-during-election-season/">Remain Sane During this Election Season with Unpolitic.me</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we all know THAT person. The one who&#8217;s filling up your news feed with all the meme&#8217;s and posts supporting their favorite political party and attacking the other. If you&#8217;re like me, you may find some of them funny or intriguing but are completely fed up with being forced to read this every day until the election is over.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case then I encourage all of you to check out <a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/unpoliticme/ecnbjncmlfdfdpnnbloliloehpcmjglg">Unpolitic.me</a>. This handy Chrome extension will block out any political garbage from your Facebook and Twitter news feed and replace it with pictures of adorable cats from <a href="http://instagram.com/">Instagram</a>. Cats not your thing? Surprisingly the extension allows you to customize your Oba-mney blocking images with whatever feeds you desire. Just know that at least for the next two weeks Facebook and Twitter will be a little more cute, cuddly and significantly less obnoxious.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="webstore-pb-wd-Uf-Vf-Yf webstore-wd-Uf-Vf-Yf" style="opacity: 1;" src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/s8Be2i_SGwmBEyWVRZzTsjJTTPLT5ME1ZImNIgHV3Nwc8GMbM4gc-ZXjl6k5VNtoHnsIo41inQ=s640-h400-e365" alt="" width="640px" height="400px" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>via <a href="http://thenextweb.com/shareables/2012/10/24/unpolitic-me-a-chrome-extension-that-removes-politics-from-your-facebook-and-twitter-feeds/">TheNextWeb</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/remain-sane-during-election-season/">Remain Sane During this Election Season with Unpolitic.me</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/10/remain-sane-during-election-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Brief History of Brand SEO and the Google Machine [Infographic]</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/a-brief-history-brand-seo-google-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/a-brief-history-brand-seo-google-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Talbot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idfive.com/blog/?p=2723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Brands. We all have our favorites and as Pete explains in his whitepaper, The Truth About Branding, a brand can become many things to many different people. But how do we learn about brands in the first place. Well, that is just about as complicated of an answer as it is to define the universe. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/a-brief-history-brand-seo-google-machine/">A Brief History of Brand SEO and the Google Machine [Infographic]</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brands.</p>
<p>We all have our favorites and as Pete explains in his whitepaper, <a href="http://idfive.com/insight/whitepapers/truth-about-branding">The Truth About Branding</a>, a brand can become many things to many different people. But how do we learn about brands in the first place. Well, that is just about as complicated of an answer as it is to define the universe. However, one of the many way&#8217;s we can learn about brands is through search. In today&#8217;s world we often value brands and their sites with what shows up at the top of a Google search result page.</p>
<p>Over the years Google&#8217;s algorithm has gone through many changes. Some of the updates have severely punished new sites and young brand websites while others have put an emphasis on brand SEO and local search.</p>
<p>SEO is more important than ever before and brands are forced to work hard to get noticed and retain customers. Today, brands have multiple opportunities to appear on a search results page from organic results to paid listings (Adwords), product search, local search, Google Instant and  that doesn&#8217;t  include any social media links that might show up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/brand-brand-brand.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2725" title="brand-brand-brand" src="http://www.idfive.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/brand-brand-brand.png" alt="Google and Brand SEO" width="500" height="3625" /><br />
</a><a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/brand-brand-brand.png"><em>C</em><em>lick to Enlarge</em></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/a-brief-history-brand-seo-google-machine/">A Brief History of Brand SEO and the Google Machine [Infographic]</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/a-brief-history-brand-seo-google-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s Dilemma: Ads vs. IPO</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/facebooks-dilemma-ads-vs-ipo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/facebooks-dilemma-ads-vs-ipo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Talbot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idfive.com/blog/?p=2690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading a few of these types of articles. I don&#8217;t think this is a big surprise that advertising in general often misses it&#8217;s intended target and never really gets 80-100% visibility. Things are going mobile, especially for Facebook and other social networks. The problem with that is Facebook (and others) hasn&#8217;t figured out [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/facebooks-dilemma-ads-vs-ipo/">Facebook&#8217;s Dilemma: Ads vs. IPO</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading a few of <a href="http://marketday.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12069407-facebooks-problem-ads-arent-grabbing-users-analysts-say?lite">these types of articles</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is a big surprise that advertising in general often misses it&#8217;s intended target and never really gets 80-100% visibility. Things are going mobile, especially for Facebook and other social networks. The problem with that is Facebook (and others) hasn&#8217;t figured out how to migrate ads and all of the functionality of the website to a mobile experience, yet. One of the other things I&#8217;ve been reading about is that a fair amount of users make profiles but never return to use the site. Some of that population ends up using Facebook as a login service or only use the site once an access to their mobile services.</p>
<p>I believe some of that some of the speculation is true but it&#8217;s not as big of a deal as some of the articles, <a href="http://marketday.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12069407-facebooks-problem-ads-arent-grabbing-users-analysts-say?lite">including this one</a>, make it out to be. It&#8217;s an area that&#8217;s never been explored before and Facebook&#8217;s initial growth over the past 5-6 years has been our only benchmark. We are finally seeing Facebook&#8217;s traffic waning a bit as the site and the experience becomes more ubiquitous and integrated with other services. Traffic comes and goes in cycles and up until this point there&#8217;s been a lot of upward movement and I think we are starting to see things come down and start to level off, finally.</p>
<p>Truth is, Facebook is still the largest social network, available in the most countries and has the most active user base, desktop &amp; mobile. One downside is that Facebook faces is that its rivals [LinkedIn, Twitter, &amp; Google+ (<a href="http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2012/03/08/for-the-last-time-lets-all-say-it-together-google-is-not-a-social-network/">which really isn't a social network</a>)] have had time to figure out their game plan and use some of Facebook&#8217;s bad press to attract some users to sign up and either use their services exclusively or in addition to Facebook, both lowering Facebook&#8217;s market share.</p>
<p>When Facebook finds a way to monetize their mobile experience, we will see another major shift in the dynamic of the network as more people leave or switch back to desktop/tablet usage as a way to avoid ads or at least minimize the effect of ads on their experience.</p>
<p>My last article, <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/05/can-facebook-ads-make-you-rich/">Can Facebook Ads Make You Rich? Yes. Well&#8230;No. Maybe?</a>, touches on why Facebook ads can be a little hit or miss, especially if you don&#8217;t know what you are doing. I think if companies like Ford, GE, &amp; Coke are finding value on the platform through Ads and Pages then I have to believe that the platform has potential. Even if you aren&#8217;t increasing sales, you are increasing your brands share of voice (SOV) and brand equity, <a href="http://idfive.com/insight/whitepapers/truth-about-branding">which some would argue is just as important</a>. But whatever you do, make sure that you are there for <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/1713141/a-social-media-strategy-checklist">a reason and develop a strategy (and goals)</a> BEFORE you start.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/facebooks-dilemma-ads-vs-ipo/">Facebook&#8217;s Dilemma: Ads vs. IPO</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/06/facebooks-dilemma-ads-vs-ipo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dirty Secret Behind User Data Collection &amp; Tracking</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/03/the-dirty-secret-behind-user-data-collection-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/03/the-dirty-secret-behind-user-data-collection-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katelyn Jacobsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idfive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitepapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idfive.com/blog/?p=2506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Privacy’s always been a big concern on the Internet. Ever since the invention of “cookies” back in 1994 there’s been an ongoing (and sometimes contentious) debate over who gets to collect personal data about users, how that data is collected, and how it’s used. On one side are the marketers, retailers, advertisers, and publishers trying [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/03/the-dirty-secret-behind-user-data-collection-tracking/">The Dirty Secret Behind User Data Collection &amp; Tracking</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Privacy’s always been a big concern on the Internet. Ever since the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookie#History" target="_blank">invention of “cookies”</a> back in 1994 there’s been an ongoing (and sometimes contentious) debate over who gets to collect personal data about users, how that data is collected, and how it’s used.</p>
<p>On one side are the marketers, retailers, advertisers, and publishers trying to gather as much data as possible in order to target advertising more efficiently, sell more products, and deliver content tailored to users’ needs and wants. On the other side are privacy advocates, “hacktivist” groups like the now-infamous Anonymous, and consumer organizations who contend that collecting data about online behavior is an invasion of users’ right to privacy. But while the privacy advocates have won a few skirmishes in the war over the decades, the trend vectors have always pointed towards collecting more and more information.</p>
<p>Recently the debate flared up again over Google’s moves to capture and aggregate data from across their many properties (including Google+ and their ubiquitous search engine) in order to form incredibly detailed profiles of users and their online behavior&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>To read more of Sean&#8217;s <a href="http://idfive.com/insight/whitepapers/dirty-secret-behind-user-data-collection-tracking" target="_blank">The Dirty Secret Behind User Data Collection &amp; Tracking</a> please visit March&#8217;s idfive Whitepapers.</p>
<p>And while you&#8217;re at it, if you would like to receive more insightful articles written by the lovely team of idfive, <a href="http://eepurl.com/brI4f" target="_blank">please sign up to be a part of our mailing list.</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/03/the-dirty-secret-behind-user-data-collection-tracking/">The Dirty Secret Behind User Data Collection &amp; Tracking</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/03/the-dirty-secret-behind-user-data-collection-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google making us E-Tards?</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/11/is-google-making-us-e-tards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/11/is-google-making-us-e-tards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Stephenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attentionscan.com/?p=2266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In short, I can say that Google has made me a little e-tarded.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/11/is-google-making-us-e-tards/">Is Google making us E-Tards?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In short, I can say that Google has made me a little e-tarded.</p>
<p><a href="http://attentionscan.com/2011/11/is-google-making-us-e-tards/googleandmemory/" rel="attachment wp-att-2267"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2267" title="googleandmemory" src="http://attentionscan.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/googleandmemory-386x1024.jpg" alt="" width="386" height="1024" /></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/11/is-google-making-us-e-tards/">Is Google making us E-Tards?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/11/is-google-making-us-e-tards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Blind Search Feedback Loop</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/06/the-blind-search-feedback-loop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/06/the-blind-search-feedback-loop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Talbot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authenticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attentionscan.com/?p=1614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So lately I&#8217;ve been  doing a lot of reading and research on search engine optimization (SEO) and search engine marketing (SEM) best practices. A practice that until recently I knew a little about but a lot of which deals with keywords (how we search the web) and other on- &#38; off-page  tactics to help search [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/06/the-blind-search-feedback-loop/">The Blind Search Feedback Loop</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So lately I&#8217;ve been  doing a lot of reading and research on search engine optimization (SEO) and search engine marketing (SEM) best practices. A practice that until recently I knew a little about but a lot of which deals with keywords (how we search the web) and other on- &amp; off-page  tactics to help search engines find, index and serve your site to potential customers. Everyone seems to have their own &#8220;tricks&#8221; or methodologies behind what a good SEO/SEM strategy involves and how to go about implementing these changes to your site. But in all that reading I feel like one small factor has been missed, human search pathology.</p>
<p>Our reliance on Google, Yahoo, Bing &amp; Aol to serve up web pages has become a debilitating disease from most people using the web today. If something doesn&#8217;t exist on the first two or three pages in our minds it probably doesn&#8217;t exist and has developed an entire industry of &#8220;experts&#8221; to help companies find there way to the top. Although there are exceptions, we often choose to explore only the first few choices provided to us. And one of Google&#8217;s latest inventions, Google Instant, is amplifying the problem.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s the problem with instant search results and algorithms that pull content based on words and phrases in web pages? Well, nothing really.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s another part of the equation that isn&#8217;t immediately noticed when you are searching the web or even Facebook that is plaguing the internet &#8212; personalized search results.</p>
<p>Aside from the links we click on, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm">algorithms</a>, &#8220;<a href="http://searchengineland.com/why-google-panda-is-more-a-ranking-factor-than-algorithm-update-82564">pandas</a>&#8221; and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_spiders">spiders</a> are the ones who help decide what our choices are on the web. Normally this is a good thing, we can find more information related to our search query that is relative to other topics, interests and sites we&#8217;ve visited in the past and Facebook&#8217;s instant personalizations of web sites can also help you identify articles your friends have read and enjoyed. However, as Eli Pariser will explain in the video below, this method of personalization can cut us off from the rest of the connected world by filtering out what <em>it</em> thinks we &#8220;don&#8217;t&#8221; need to see. It can exclude anything from breaking news and events happening locally or around the world.</p>
<p>What do you think &#8212; Does instant personalization of the web lead to better productivity or a limited view of the world? Is there a happy medium? Where should search engines draw the line?</p>
<p><object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/B8ofWFx525s?version=3" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object><!-- br--></p>
<p><em>Video originally found on <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5814100/the-problem-with-your-google-search-results-and-what-you-can-do-about-it">Lifehacker &#8211; The Problem with Your Google Search Result Feedback Loop (and What You Can Do About It)</a>.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/06/the-blind-search-feedback-loop/">The Blind Search Feedback Loop</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/06/the-blind-search-feedback-loop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would You Pass Facebook&#8217;s Grammar Test?</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/02/would-you-pass-facebooks-grammar-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/02/would-you-pass-facebooks-grammar-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Talbot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding advertising awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Busines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attentionscan.com/?p=1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Each PPC advertising platform out there has its own set of rules and a few inevitable quirks that makes it different from the rest. Some are more restrictive than other and even Google will drop your rankings if they catch you &#8220;cheating&#8221; but most of these PPC advertising markets don&#8217;t restrict the type of content [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/02/would-you-pass-facebooks-grammar-test/">Would You Pass Facebook&#8217;s Grammar Test?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each PPC advertising platform out there has its own set of rules and a few inevitable quirks that makes it different from the rest. Some are more restrictive than other and even Google will drop your rankings if they catch you &#8220;cheating&#8221; but most of these PPC advertising markets don&#8217;t restrict the type of content or the grammar that you can use to convey your message. Yeah, yeah, you can&#8217;t use numbers in place of words (ie: &#8220;4&#8243; vs &#8220;for&#8221;) or use explicit language or direct someone to a misleading or malicious site but most don&#8217;t have as much of a problem with grammar, punctuation and capitalization as Facebook does. Though, I&#8217;m sure, promoting an ad with grammatical errors wouldn&#8217;t get you very far anyway.</p>
<p>Facebook has taken many steps to ensure the &#8220;quality&#8221; of each ad they show on their site is consistent and appropriate to all audiences. Some of their requirements will come as no surprise but others will make you stop and ask <em>&#8220;What&#8217;s the big deal?&#8221; </em>If you&#8217;ve ever stumbled along the <em><a href="https://www.facebook.com/ads/mistakes.php">Common Advert Mistakes</a></em> page then you probably already know how much of a pain it can be to get passed the approval process while building your campaign&#8217;s structure but aren&#8217;t quite ready to finalize the ad copy or images. However it is a great form of quality control that standardizes and limits what advertisers can do and virtually levels the playing field for all of us.</p>
<p>Facebook has also developed strict rules a that only apply to <a href="https://www.facebook.com/help/?topic=disapproved_dating">dating services</a> and which ones can or can&#8217;t advertise on Facebook. They&#8217;ve also set a strict set of guidelines on how they can a display their ads. Their <a href="https://www.facebook.com/help/?page=409">Help Center</a> is full of useful tools and resources, as well as, a complete list of <a href="https://www.facebook.com/help/?topic=disapproved_prohibited">reasons why your ads could be disapproved</a>. I would suggest giving all this a good look before jumping head first into a Facebook Adverts campaign. It will save you a lot of time and effort later down the road when you can&#8217;t figure out why you haven&#8217;t cracked the &#8220;Facebook code&#8221;.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/02/would-you-pass-facebooks-grammar-test/">Would You Pass Facebook&#8217;s Grammar Test?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2011/02/would-you-pass-facebooks-grammar-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google Going After Vonage and Skype?</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/08/is-google-going-after-vonage-and-skype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/08/is-google-going-after-vonage-and-skype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andres Zapata</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[andres zapata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social.autumnrayne.net/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a home phone number. Haven&#8217;t had one in five years. Haven&#8217;t really needed one&#8230; except when I am working from home and I have marathon conference calls and I feel my mobile minutes slipping away. And so, I always hoped for a way to make calls from my computer at no cost. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/08/is-google-going-after-vonage-and-skype/">Is Google Going After Vonage and Skype?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a home phone number. Haven&#8217;t had one in five years. Haven&#8217;t really needed one&#8230; except when I am working from home and I have marathon conference calls and I feel my mobile minutes slipping away.</p>
<p>And so, I always hoped for a way to make calls from my computer at no cost. Between Google Talk and Google Call, you&#8217;ve got the bulk of what makes Skype appealing &#8211; except Google is free (for now).</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/google/status/22199802288">In one day, Google 1 million calls went through Google Talk</a>. Vonage, Skype, make way for the gorilla.</p>
<p>Google, if you are listening, connect Google Talk to Google Voice for free and I will stop writing about how you are the devil. I promise.  Also, as a friendly FYI, you should start coming up with better names for these products&#8230; you&#8217;ve got Google Voice, Google Talk and Google Call.  It&#8217;s confusing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/08/is-google-going-after-vonage-and-skype/">Is Google Going After Vonage and Skype?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/08/is-google-going-after-vonage-and-skype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Life Social Network</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/07/the-real-life-social-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/07/the-real-life-social-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>idfive</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social.autumnrayne.net/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul Adams from the UX team at Google gave a fantastic presentation on how our online social networks differ from the social networks we cultivate in real life, and how online networks need to change to match the types of social groups people have been creating since the beginning of humanity. If you don&#8217;t have [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/07/the-real-life-social-network/">The Real Life Social Network</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Adams from the UX team at Google gave a fantastic presentation on how our online social networks differ from the social networks we cultivate in real life, and how online networks need to change to match the types of social groups people have been creating since the beginning of humanity. If you don&#8217;t have time to flip through the 216 (!) slide talk, here&#8217;s the gist:</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><span style="font-weight: bold;">Social networking is not going away &#8211; </span>Social networks are fast becoming our main resource for purchasing and activity decisions. We are much more likely to trust someone we know than someone we do not, and especially more likely to trust someone we know than the company trying to sell us something.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Social networking is not new &#8211; </span>Humans have evolved to create social bonds and work together as a group.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">People don&#8217;t have one group of friends</span>  &#8211; We each have important but separate social groups in real life. Why  is it then that all of our contacts are blobbed together in one group on  our various online networks? Not just on Facebook, but in IM, Twitter,  etc.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Our social capacity is and always has been about 150 people</span> &#8211; Nomad groups would split in to two separate groups once the numbered over 150. Roman soldiers were split into groups of 150 so everyone would know each other. We can of course know more than 150 people, but staying in touch with more than 150 people&#8217;s lives is difficult or impossible.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">We each have weak and strong ties <span style="font-weight: bold;">- </span></span>Out of all the people we know, on average only 2-6 of them will be &#8216;strong ties.&#8217; These are our support structure. They are who&#8217;s opinion&#8217;s we trust the most. The other 145 people in our network are &#8216;weak ties.&#8217;  Social networking interactions need to be designed with strong ties in mind.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Mapping influence is a tricky thing </span>- There&#8217;s a lot of research being conducted on how influence happens. We&#8217;re heavily influenced by the people physically present around us. We&#8217;re also heavily influenced by our strong ties. Think about the last time you research a product or service? Who did you ask for advice? Our decisions are more and more frequently being made by our social group.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">People care deeply about how they appear to others </span>- Social networking is an extension of identity and to that end, people put in a ton of effort in shaping how they appear to their social circle. Our identities are multi-faceted, which is why it&#8217;s important that as social networks evolve, they respect the desire and need to control how we appear to different groups of people.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">People care deeply about privacy</span> &#8211; Only 8% of Facebook users have their profile open to the public. 64% have adjusted it to &#8220;Only Friends.&#8221; 71% change their privacy settings in some way. It&#8217;s up to social networks to make these settings and the implications of them even more legible to their user base.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Privacy enhances trust</span> &#8211; And when you trust a company, you&#8217;re much more likely to do business with them.</p>
<div style="width: 477px;" id="__ss_4656436"><strong style="display: block; margin: 12px 0pt 4px;"><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/padday/the-real-life-social-network-v2" title="The Real Life Social Network v2">The Real Life Social Network v2</a></strong><object id="__sse4656436" width="477" height="510"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/doc_player.swf?doc=vtm2010-100701010846-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=the-real-life-social-network-v2"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed name="__sse4656436" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/doc_player.swf?doc=vtm2010-100701010846-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=the-real-life-social-network-v2" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="477" height="510"></embed></object>
<div style="padding: 5px 0pt 12px;">View more <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/">documents</a> from <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/padday">Paul Adams</a>.</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/07/the-real-life-social-network/">The Real Life Social Network</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2010/07/the-real-life-social-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
