<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>attentionscan &#187; censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/category/censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog</link>
	<description>more signal, less noise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why SOPA’s Bad for Education…And Everyone Else</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/02/why-sopas-bad-for-education-and-everyone-else/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/02/why-sopas-bad-for-education-and-everyone-else/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katelyn Jacobsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitepapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attentionscan.com/?p=2459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently written in idfive&#8217;s newsletter and whitepapers, Sean Carton reflects on SOPA and its effect on America&#8217;s free speech, as well as simple things that help our work function on a daily basis. On a personal level, I first thought SOPA will only hurt those that pirate goodies like music and movies on the internet, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/02/why-sopas-bad-for-education-and-everyone-else/">Why SOPA’s Bad for Education…And Everyone Else</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently written in idfive&#8217;s newsletter and <a href="http://www.idfive.com/insight/whitepapers/" target="_blank">whitepapers</a>, Sean Carton reflects on SOPA and its effect on America&#8217;s free speech, as well as simple things that help our work function on a daily basis. On a personal level, I first thought SOPA will only hurt those that pirate goodies like music and movies on the internet, and then I realized that some of the things I do (sharing videos of adorable animals on my tumblr) makes me a pirate, too.</p>
<p>Please read more from Sean&#8217;s <a href="http://idfive.com/insight/whitepapers/why-sopa-bad-education-and-everyone-else" target="_blank">Why SOPA’s Bad for Education…And Everyone Else.</a></p>
<p>And while you&#8217;re at it, if you would like to receive more insightful articles written by the lovely team of idfive, <a href="http://eepurl.com/brI4f" target="_blank">please sign up to be a part of our mailing list.</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/02/why-sopas-bad-for-education-and-everyone-else/">Why SOPA’s Bad for Education…And Everyone Else</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2012/02/why-sopas-bad-for-education-and-everyone-else/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury d&#8217;Ethique Publicitaire</title>
		<link>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2007/03/jury-dethique-publicitaire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2007/03/jury-dethique-publicitaire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>idfive</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social.autumnrayne.net/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Adjudication of the Jury d&#8217;Ethique Publicitaire: Complaint: The ad is regarded as degrading and shocking, of bad taste, vulgar, disrespectful of human dignity and morals, scandalous with respect to children. The advertiser made the point that the spot was in the form of a satire. It did not harm human dignity but reversed the roles [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2007/03/jury-dethique-publicitaire/">Jury d&#8217;Ethique Publicitaire</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Adjudication of the Jury d&#8217;Ethique Publicitaire:</p>
<p>Complaint:<br /> The ad is regarded as degrading and shocking, of bad taste, vulgar, disrespectful of human dignity and morals, scandalous with respect to children. The advertiser made the point that the spot was in the form of a satire. It did not harm human dignity but reversed the roles of the traditional sexist stereotypes. The difference with other spots that show naked people is the age and the weight of the actor; the message does not conform to the theories which presume that any human body that does not fit the standards of perfection must be regarded as shocking and thus socially dangerous.</p>
<p>Position of the Jury:<br />After examination and taking into account many negative reactions received, the Jury decided that the images undermine human dignity, in particular by showing inappropriate sexual behaviour in a workplace, which is against article 2 of the code of the CCI. It also concluded that the commercial was not in conformity with the recommendations of the code of ethics in advertising concerning the representation of the human person in publicity. The Jury consequently recommended the cessation of the commercial. &#8220;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bestrejectedadvertising.com/html/?page=tv&#038;type=banned&amp;id=27">http://www.bestrejectedadvertising.com/html/?page=tv&#038;type=banned&amp;id=27</a></p>
<p>Basically, this site is a wonderful window into the worries broadcasters and governments have about advertising.  Some of the worries are about accuracy, some are prudish,  some are mysterious even to one as  inaccurate and prudish as me.  The accompanying reasons and their explication is a textbook on, to misconstrue Bloom, the anxiety of influence.  These ads are being rejected because they will inappropriately influence people or expose them to something  they shoould be safe from.</p>
<p>This whole site had me asking the same question over and over: how powerful do these people think advertising is?   Or will these ads, unchained, actually do what it is claimed?</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog/2007/03/jury-dethique-publicitaire/">Jury d&#8217;Ethique Publicitaire</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.idfive.com/blog">attentionscan</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.idfive.com/blog/2007/03/jury-dethique-publicitaire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
